Problem:
The User Details Page in the Admin Tool could benefit from a UI/UX review to improve clarity and prevent unintended manual changes to system-managed data. Currently, there is no clear distinction between USER (central CPL account), MULTIUSER (organisation-specific user), and INTEGRATIONS (HR systems like Fourth or Evo), which may lead to inconsistencies.
Suggested Solution:
It might be helpful to explore a rework of the User Details Page to better distinguish between these data sources. Introducing clearer sections for USER, MULTIUSER, and INTEGRATIONS, along with restrictions on editing fields managed by integrations, could enhance usability and data integrity. For example, ensuring that fields like name and job title remain locked when sourced from Fourth, and extending restrictions to email for Evo-linked users, could prevent unintended updates. This could be worth considering for future roadmap discussions.
